Criticism of the Church in the Canterbury Tales Essay

The Canterbury Tales, a collection of tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, was written in Middle English at the end of the fourteenth ascorbic acid (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2011). It is considered to be the best work of literature in English in the Middle Ages (Johnston, 1998). Chaucer uses literary devices as no one had ever done. In addition, he chose to use English instead of Latin. This masterpiece is incorpor ingestd in a similar way as Bocaccios Decameron. The tales ar organized within a frame narrative (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2011) explained in the General Prologue by the narrator a group of pilgrims that are sacking to visit St.Thomas Becket in Canterburys Cathedral.These pilgrims are from different estates of the medieval society nobility, the church and peasantry (The Norton Anthology, 1993 76). by dint of the characters, Chaucer reveals some aspects of the society he lived in. In other words, instead of creating typical role models, the characters are overstated individua ls very(prenominal) different from the prototypical idea. The author uses hyperbolic characters and irony to create humour and criticism. For example, the knight is non the typical medieval soldier the reader would expect. He avoids conflict being a very sentimentalist person.In a similar way, the characters that are part of the church are also very peculiar. At the time when Chaucer wrote this poem, the Catholic Church was very powerful and rich. The clergy enjoyed great fortunes and a high quality of keep compared with the peasantry who was starving and dying. In this essay, Im going to deal with the criticism towards the Catholic Church analysing the teetotal portrays of the Prioress, the Monk, the friar and the Pardoner. Chaucer begins writing about the finesse of the church in the General Prologue when the Prioress is introduced.The Prioress is a nun with very trustworthy manners (e. g. she wipes her lips before drinking, lines 133-134) that behaves as if she were a la dy of the court (e. g. she speaks french solely with a very bad accent, lines 124-125). The Prioress is also very romantic as we jakes see in her brooch and her motto Amor vincit omnia -Love conquest all- (Dr. Melillo, 1996). She is also very affable and sensitive. For instance, she cries when a mouse falls in a trap and feeds her dogs meat so they do non starve. This image of nice person contrasts with the reality of the time.If her words and actions are analyzed, the audience can understand that this was non the typical behavior of a nun. She is more worried about her pets than the commoners who actually did starve and rarely ate meat. The narrator is portraying her as a very naive person in a very nice tone that hides the irony. Nevertheless, the audience was aware that she is not fulfilling the cultivate of the Church take care of throng (The Norton Anthology, 199376). The Monk is the following pilgrim described in the General Prologue. According to his description he is very interest in hunting and in horses (line 166).A monk should not be riding and hunting but obeying, praying, copying and studying. In addition, the Monk is fully aware that his order does not allow these practices and he admits that he does not follow the rules of his order (Jokinen, 2010) (lines 174-175). When the portrait of the Monk finishes in the General Prologue, the man described is bald, juicy and well-dressed. Any person in that time that heard this description would immediately think about a lord not a monk. Although the narrator likes the life style of the Monk and his description is not very acid, we can see how Chaucer is criticizing some monks lives.Monks are supposed to be obedient and to wed vow of poverty not to reject rules and live the life they want. After analyzing two characters against who the narrator does not show great rejection, I am going to analyze the friar and the Pardoner who the narrator describes in a very ironic and bitter tone. A friar is a roaming priest that begs for living whose address is to help beggars and lepers selflessly. On the contrary, this friar really detests this kind of action because he does not get each benefice from it (lines 242-247). He likes to enjoy life and pleasures.He shows that he is not like a practice friar implying that he is above (lines 210-211) like an aristocrat (Knapp, 1999). In this sense, he acts like the Prioress does, sham not to be who he really is, a beggar. The reader also knows that he accepts bribes and gives easy repentance for extra donations so he can live better. He justifies his conduct explaining that giving bills is a sign of repentance. Nevertheless, the Friar, as the Monk, is supposed to have done the vow of poverty. Contradicting any preconceived ideas the reader whitethorn have about friars, he has a good quality life thanks to keeping the money he should give his order nd receiving extra incomes.In the description of the character, the audience understood ho w Chaucer is decry the abuses of the Church by creating a person who does not follow any of the prototypical characteristics of a good Christian friar. Finally, I am going to explain in detail the character of the Pardoner. The Pardoner resembles the Friar in the fact that both get money from people (with a religious reason behind) for a living and keep it for themselves. However, there are some differences the Pardoner is not part of an order whereas the Friar is and he does not believe in what he does either while the Friar justifies it.The Pardoner is considered the approximately hypocrite character of all because he embodies all the sins he preaches against. He sells papal indulgences in permute of donation that he keeps for himself display avarice (lines 389-391). In addition, he admits that he does not feel censurable and that the relics he sells are a fraud. Furthermore, he tells the other pilgrims his tricks implying that he lies and manipulates people to get money. Iro nically, after he has admitted that he is a liar, the Pardoner gives a kind of sermon against gluttony, drunkenness, gambling and swearing.Moreover, his tale can be considered an exemplum (Patterson, 1976) that warns against avarice and drunkenness. He gives an instance of the kind of person he is when he tries to sell one of his relics to the array even when he has already told them they are forged and useless. Apart from being described as, what we would call now, a con artist and a sinful person, there are allusions to his condition of homosexual and eunuch (Jokinen, 1998). only these characteristics make him appear in the margins of society. As I said before, this character is the one that better represents the hypocrisy that Chaucer shows in this work.As I said, he represents all the sins he preaches against he drinks (his finishes his drink before stating the tale) he lies (about his relics, line 394), and he is greedy (he keeps the money, line 409). Through this character, the author shows a very sinful and get down church away from their goal. To conclude, Chaucer shows a very hypocrite and selfish members of the Church in The Canterbury Tales. In the 14th century, the Catholic Church was very influential and religion was present in everyday life. The purpose of the Church was supposed to be the caring of the people.Nonetheless, the characters in this poem do not worry about anything else that themselves and their actions are directed always to their own benefit. Through their words and actions described ironically by the narrator, the characters reflect their sins and their degeneration and by extension, the sins and corruption of the Church. It can be concluded that in The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer makes a social criticism showing the dishonesty of the Church. However, it should be pointed out that the characters are an exaggerated version of the original people because the main aim of this work is to be enjoyable for the audience.

Big Bang theory and the problem of nothingness Essay

The question of wherefore in that respect is something rather than nothing concerns with the creation of things in the universe we know that wholly things come from different things, objects ar made by humans, tress grow from seeds, etc. If the human mind traces back the roots of all these things, the causes of all these things, it will always come to an idea of a shaper and for years the idea of the Maker has been held by God. But then, even the idea of a God or a Maker is perplexing who made the Maker? Yet, how can there always stir been a something in the for the first time amaze?Or do we conceive a state of nothingness? That out of nothing comes something, probably the first maker or cause. The problem lies in how something can come out of nothing. A theory to sufficiently answer the question of nothingness must first prove that it indeed start out with nothing. The openhanded Bang Theory provides a model by which there seems to be nothing, and out of that nothingne ss came something the composition of the cosmos and everything we know of. However, if the blown-up Bang Theory is true, it still does not answer the question of why there is something rather than nothing.The Big Bang Model is the widely accepted theory of the universes evolution, with its premise that the universe started out as dense and hot state that has been dining for about 14 one million million years. First of all, the Big Bang Theory starts out with something a particle, a hot and dense space. At its most basic level it already does not fulfill the requirements of nothingness. There could be nothing in that hot dense space nothing material that our senses could perceive or our minds can imagine, but the laws of acquaintance tell us that all energy is transferred, nothing is lost.Therefore, the energy of the hot dense space is what created other objects in space the energy simply evolved or transferred. This proves that there is something rather than nothing even in the Big Bang Theory. This seems to be a tautological argument, but consider this can nothingness expand? If the tenets of Big Bang Theory be considered, the question still arises does nothingness have properties? Does nothingness have temperature? If the universe came from a hot, dense space, then it is not nothingness because nothingness does not have both properties nothingness does not exist.Any existence of a supposed property of nothingness defeats its state of nothingness. Therefore, the Big Bang Theory is just a substitute for the idea of a Maker if we do not believe in God the Creator and subscribe to science instead, Big Bang is a best choice, but it still poses the question where did the hot, dense space come from? Or at least, where did the heat and concentration come from? It seems then that the question of nothingness is still not solved.

Filipino People and Rizal Essay

Introduction During Rizals time, he showed us what a real character of a char is on those times. He told in one of his letter that from his infancy woman argon with agreeable manners, beauteous ways, and modest demeanor. But he to a fault told us that there was in solely an admixture of servitude and deference to the words or whims of their so-c exclusivelyed spiritual fathers, due to excessive kindness, modesty, or perhaps ignorance. They seemed faded plants lay and reargond in darkness. The woman of Rizals time responded to the first appeal in the interest of the upbeat of the nation.Rizal utter now that you lease set an example to those who, like you, long to permit their eyes opened and be delivered from servitude, new hopes are awakened in us and we now even dare to face adversity, be put forward we have you for our all in allies and are self-confident of victory. This term paper will discuss what are the identity of Filipina from the previous(prenominal) and the w omen identity today. The signifi stinkerce of woman from the bypast who followed Rizals bravery to com cue for their right and their characters, will everywherely try to see what kind of woman identity should a Filipino have, the Filipino women in Rizals novel or some of our woman leaders of todays.What is a Filipina? Is she Asian or Western? Is she the loth leader Corazon Aquino, or is she the self-proclaimed symbol of beauty for her people Imelda Marcos? Is she the modern-day Gabriela Silang who envisions and works towards cross-sectoral changes, or is she one of the millions of anonymous and nameless struggling multitude who does some(prenominal)thing just to put rice on the table, the ordinary Juana de la Cruz?The hint of an early paradigm of gender character and equivalence may have, to some extent, begun the process of identity formation. On the surface, the Philippine myth does not seem to introduce the notion of divergence. What is projected is compatibility and ha rmony. Just when and how, then, did the problems of identity conflict for the Philippine woman come about? The language of the colonizer is found to not only cause as a vehicle for literary expression, but in like manner for setting forth the idealized go for of a Filipina from a male perspective.A brief glance at literature shows an evolution of sorts of the Filipina from the pre-compound Maganda of autochthonal folklore, to the early 1800s Laura who epitomizes beauty and faithful acceptance of her role as prescribed by culture, religion, and society and to the fancied characterization of womanhood drawn from two works of historical fiction by Jose Rizal, Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. Although Rizals central protagonists in both novels are men, the significance of the women characters lies in their symbolic portrayals of a people of umteen ascertains, of a country torn apart by race, culture, and kin.In Rizals attempt to define a nations identity by addressing the n eed for national reforms and by exposing the evils of colonialism, he may have withal encouraged the need to demystify the Filipina. The colonial Spanish periods desired image of a Filipina is embodied in the character of Maria Clarabeautiful, demure, modest, enduring, devoutly religious, cultured, submissive, and virginal. The blood that runs through her veins is more European than native. Her ancestry is noted since it has a bearing on the idealized model of a Filipina, the Roman Catholics Virgin Mary, and European and foreign.Maria Clara belongs to the elite her kindness is not to be equated, however, with social awareness. She is a repressed woman and her weakness and despair over a lost love overwhelm her, enable powerful and sinister forces to slowly drive her to death. Perhaps, to a certain degree, this ideal is still upheld today, contributing to the discombobulation of identity formation, for the original application of the character Filipino was only for Spaniards and t heir descendants who lived on the islands the indigenous natives were only when called indios. The 19th century saw a character reversal process the latter(prenominal) (indios) who have capitulated, are now called Filipinos while the former, virtuallyly direct descendants of colonizers, now prefer to call them Spanish. The character Dona Victorina is a reflection of the triumph of colonialismthe alteration of behavior and thinking patterned after the characters intelligence of a superior race. One hundred years ago, there was a Dona Victorina. Today, the trappings of a colonial mindset persist, and are expressed in the attraction to look Western and to consume Western goods.Dona Victorina is a characterization of lost identity. Her frivolity, and that of Paulita Gomez, who is greatly enamored by the trappings of the elite, who loves the man who could maintain the take of her class, and who is a vain and flighty version of Maria Clara, may be seen today in the persona of Imelda Marcos. The likes of Imelda Marcos also mirror, ironically, another Rizal character, Dona Consolacion, who can be described as an interesting specimen of colonial deformation. She may assist as an example of the dehumanization of the indio, a case of total alienation from her original self, or from her authority self.The character Sisa also represents the opposite image of Paulita, a contradiction of the so-called high status and the liberated label describing the Filipino women today. She is the woman Mary Hollensteiner speaks of in her article, The Wife quietly suffering from subjugation, sacrificing to put nutrient on the table, living only for her sons. Sisa represents the silent victims of an burdensomeness which drove her to madness and death.There are millions of Sisas in the Philippines today the unfortunate women who are scavenging for food in the mountains of trash, the degraded women whose bodies are used as commodities, and the handle wives who are repeatedly beate n by their husbands. The other woman, Juli, emerges as the one character that chooses death over a life in shame. She suffers abuse and humiliation functional as a servant to manu concomitanture her familys debt. She brings to mind the women of today who work for starvation wages.Juli refuses to be coerced her death liberates her from oppression. Among these characters, perhaps Juli ruff characterizes a sense of purpose and identity. In Rizals characters, the women who seem to be able to obtain their desired needs no matter the consequences are Dona Victorina, Paulita Gomez, and Dona Consolacion. On the other hand, misfortune seems to be the fate of the women whose consciousness could be raised to levels higher than that of self-sacrifice. The all-giving attitude of Maria Clara, Sisa, and Juli leads them to their deaths.Within their social strata, each character is gifted with varying degrees of oppression which in turn defines the parameters of liberation. In their ambition to hold on to the symbols of the ruling class, the former group has do themselves seemingly sloshed and super visible handmaidens of a system which feeds on varying levels of coercion and subjugation. The latter groups retreat into death or madness carries two con circulating(prenominal) views 1) the strength to utilisation a final liberation as a form of defiance to oppression, and 2) the weakness and inability to confront any form of injustice.Who is more oppressed? Who has really liberated herself? Perhaps, what we are seeing is the notion that oppression has slowed down the process towards a national identity in general and towards a Filipina identity in particular. The reality is that the Philippines is a country still going through the throes of colonization. Indeed, there are those who have catapulted to the highest ranks, such(prenominal) as Corazon Aquino and Imelda Marcos, who embody differences in substance, style, and character. However, there are contradictions.Corazo n Aquinos high visibility, status, and power contradicts the image of a meek and implemental wife loyal to the memory of her husband while Imelda Marcos, the Iron Butterfly of unusual extravagance, is a drastic contrast to the image of a once dutiful and subservient wife. Despite the fact that both overcame the traditional roles assigned to women of their social class by reaching positions of political power, they remain subservient to the memories of their husbands, but exemplify the interests of the class they represent.Class interest is perhaps the overriding difference between highly visible women, such as Corazon Aquino and Imelda Marcos, and the fervent activist women carrying the legacy of an intellectualized Gabriela Silang. While women in power and women working for empowerment both assert a heritage and demand a platform, the contradiction probably lies in the formers subservience and the latters ability to address issues that cut across class lines.But class again diame trically separates political women from those who suffer in silence, such as the patient and self-sacrificing women who toil to feed their families, work in sweat shops, as vendors, scavengers, and prostitutes. There are also those who come faceless and nameless for they may flit and slide and go seemingly where the wind blows, all these, indeed a kaleidoscope of conflicting Filipina identities.Not only do Rizals novels provide a intercellular substance for identity and conflict, they also allow a rare view of a peoples past which formed their culture today, and of a social cancer of which, up to the present, the best cure is still to be found. In the process of identity formation or perpetuation of identity conflict, the women in Rizals novels best serve as bridges in the development process, allowing the flow from the early 1800s mythical formation to the current emerging identity.The social, cultural and political context of both past and present are mirrored in the novels. The m yth of the high status of the Filipina has caused Philippine women, wittingly or unwittingly, to become at times participants in their own oppression. This containment by elevation has allowed the essence of womanhood to be subjected to and dictated by rules and regulations formulated by and for the satisfaction of a colonial society. Philippine women find themselves attempting to wade out of a quagmire of muddiness over their identity.Remembrance of Rizal is fast disappearing when it ought to be cherished and honored by all Filipinos. It was he who, more effectively than anyone else among his compatriots, unified the disparate inhabitants of our archipelago into one nation. It was he who made them share a unwashed rage against the foreign intruder and a common aspiration for the freedom of their land. Rizal awakened the national scruples from its lethargy not through the force of arms but with the armies of his pen.These were the Noli and El Filibusterismo, his allowter to the Women of Malolos, his youthful poems for the Motherland, his Mi past Adios that he secreted in a lamp in Fort Santiago hours before his death, and other demonstrable accusations against the Spaniards. His words were like mighty legions that won for our country the freedom we now enjoy. Summary As we all see, that woman of today are very different from the past. Filipino women today are brave and strong enough just like Rizal to fight for what they think is right.There also some women from the past who fight for their rights like reading but as compare today woman are more confident to give birth. There are woman activist who really do what a Filipino woman can do to make a stand for their fellow poor Filipino people especially those people who are uneducated, they take everything to achieve their goals. Nowadays, we are now equal with man in almost everything most especially in terms of education, all people in our country, man and woman, rich and poor are now equal in getting e ducation.Because of it we are now challenge to face the adverse dowry and continued to fight for changes, not just to limit our roles as housewives but also to continue bit for what is right, and thats what a real Filipino woman identity today. Just like Rizal, he focus on self-improvement, showing to Spain and the rest of the international community that, given the opportunity to achieve their full potential, Filipinos could stand alongside the best in the world and were eligible for self-rule.Then he set out to kick in what he had learned as an ophthalmologist, providing a basic service that was badly needed by his indigent compatriots. In his literature he emphasized the importance of education, seeing it as the path to national fall out rather than armed revolt. We all know that prudence does not consist in blindly obeying any whim of the little tin God, but in obeying only that which is groundsable and just, because blind obedience is itself the cause and origin of those whims, and those guilty of it are really to be blamed.Rizal said that God gave each individual reason and a will of his or her own to distinguish the just and the unjust, all were born without shackles and free, and nobody has a right to subjugate the will and the spirit of another. I hope we can revive the reverent sentiments of gratitude to him for his efforts in releasing us from foreign bondage. Political rhetoric is not enough to keep his heroism alive. Let us remember that he forsook the enticements of his youthful and gifted life and embraced instead the ultimate sacrifice for the welfare of his country.That is the best homage we can pay the greatest hero of our race. Conclusion The issue of racial equality is today hardly disputed in intellectual circles. During Rizals time, however, the claim that all races are essentially equal was a highly debated topic among anthropologists, biologists, and philosophers. The readers of his novels, essays, and letters are familiar with his portrayal and denunciation of Spanish colonial rule.His insistence on the education of the native Indios, the representation of the Philippines in the Cortes Generales, and more so the credit of the civil rights of the Filipino are all based on the belief that there are incomplete essentially superior nor essentially inferior races. In this belief stems the conviction that his fellow Filipinos had the capacity for impropriety and enlightenment. The present Filipino youth must(prenominal) know that in order to make their presence felt, they must understand Rizal.To understand Rizal, they must have the spirit and motivation to do so. Without such spirit or motivation, they will never be able to understand Rizals objectives or even the other heroes who fought for equality and freedom for the sake of the Fatherland. I believe that the Filipino youth will be able to move the society through these implied teachings of Jose Rizal that will sprout a new love to the Filipino Hero, I allow for that I only considered Rizals Life and Works as another general education subject that is needed to be taken.But what I get is more than just knowing Rizal, but also knowing my Filipino identity and that I must fight at all cost to protect my identity. A lot of what Rizal had dreamed of has now come true for many people in the state. He was already a modern democrat when he advocated participation in the state and society with education. Today, education is no longer a privilege among the small elite, for everybodys participation in all man matters has become a right and duty. Ones right to express him or her in all matters is founded on compulsory education with the required quality standards. References Jose Rizals Writings in Europe and its subject matter to the Filipino Youth Today Zaide, Gregorio F. & Zaide, Sonia M. 1998. Jose Rizal Life, Works and Writings of a Genius, Writer, Scientist and National Hero. Capino, Gonzales and Pineda Rizals life, works and writing stheir impact on our National identity Colonization Its Impact on Self-Image Philippine Women in Rizals Novels and Today By Linda Acupanda McGloin.

Introduction to Business: Walmart Essay

1.Unethical BusinessEthics is specify as beliefs astir(predicate) what is right and wrong or good and bad in deeds that affect other(a)s.( Therefore, wrong behaviour is behaviour that is believed to be bad or wrong actions or decisions. Other definition about ethics is the activity of examining the righteous standards of a society, and asking how these standards apply to ones life and whether these standards ar reasonable (Velasquez, 1998 pg 11). Ethics are based on personal or social beliefs. Furthermore, these beliefs are our moral standards, and moral standards differ among individuals. Thus, no one back end say with certainty that a particular action is right or wrong and good or bad.Business ethics refers to ethical or unethical behaviour of a firms employer. Unethical business refer to decision made by employer with getting maximum profit as the main reason and other parties such as employees and customers receives blackball effects. For example, a firm advertises the ir product as the best brand compared to other brands with the same type of product, only the products quality is not as good as it purported in the advertisement.2. Wal-MartWal-Mart is the largest American conjunction that runs discount department stores. It was found in 1962, Arkansas, USA by Sam Walton. It was incorporated on October 31st, 1969. Furthermore, Wal-Mart is the largest unavowed employer in the world.Wal-Mart owns and operates Sams Club(, Wal-Mart Stores Divisions U.S., and Wal-Mart International. Wal-Mart has nine different formats of retail business, which is, supercenters, food and drugs, general merchandise store, itsy-bitsy markets, cash and carry stores, membership warehouse clubs, apparel stores, soft discount stores and restaurants.Wal-Mart also offers private approximate store brands. Private trail store brands are products offered by Wal-Mart which usually has the lowest price compared to other brands that offers the same product in the store. These br ands are produced by subsidized contracts awarded to the lowest bidder. Wal-Marts private label brand includes Sams Choice, Great Value and Equate.3. DiscriminationCompanies are responsible for any problems in regards to their employees welfare. Employees with high position jobs should give proper treatment and avoid favoritism to other employees with little paid jobs. Employees who apply for a position in a firm should not be subjected to inequality because of their national origin, race, gender, or religion. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits such forms of discrimination. (Madura, J. 1998)To estimate that a certain company is practicing discrimination against a certain group, is by looking at how that certain group is distributed within the institution. There are three kinds of comparisons that show the practicing of discrimination. They include comparisons between the average benefits that the discriminated group gets and the average benefits of other workers, comparisons between the train of jobs and comparisons of advantageous positions between the discriminated and the normal labours.However, as an established company, Wal-Mart is not responsible to its workers. In fact, the three kinds of comparisons can be clearly seen in its management. They have been separate against women, minorities, and the disabled workers. Furthermore, Wal-Marts staff has also been discriminating their customers, racially(. This is very unethical, as the company cannot survive without their clients or customers. By discriminating and making offensive actions racially to customers, customers will switch to the firms competitor as the services provided are not satisfying. Moreover, some(a) customers sued Wal-Mart for not being ethically responsible.

Fredrick Expression of Allegiance to the Declaration of Independence Essay

Fredrick Expression of Allegiance to the Declaration of liberty - Essay ExampleHe had been invited to speak concerning what the Fourth of July signifies for Americas black community, and although the initial part of the speech congratulates what the trigger fathers accomplished for America, in general, the speech slowly graduates into a condemnation of the American society and the slavery. This is because he relate to slavery for he was once a slave before he escaped. His uncertainty towards the American unrestricted and the independence depicts his allegiance to the idea, although he thinks it bleak for the black community. Douglass begins his speech by addressing the president and the fellow citizens in attendance. It is noteworthy that Douglass counts himself a citizen, at par with the rest of the spectators in the audience. All through this oration, including his life, Douglass exponents equal nicety and rights, as well as nationality, for blacks. He begins his speech by mod estly excusing for being panicky in front of the audience and makes an acknowledgment that the journey to immunity was a long one considering his trifle on the way. He addresses the listeners for the gathering, which was the Fourth of July, nevertheless prompts them on the idea of the nation young, and is capable to transform in the attack years. By this, he implies the country is still on the road to the establishment of a great country. He actually believes the independence was gained, however not for the black population that is still in dire subscribe to of freedom. Douglass conceives the independence was a good advance by the founding fathers nevertheless, they still have to extend the freedom clause in actions and treatment of the black population.

Muslim Annotated Bibliography Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Islamic - Annotated Bibliography ExampleThis article explains the in-depth knowledge on the experience the Moslem youths in Canada who wants to maintain their Islamic coating face from the dominant culture. The article also shows how Muslim students are able to negotiate and maintain their ghostlike culture within secular public schools. A 22 year old student by the name Karim from Pakistan who were educated in Canadian school explains the struggles between conformity and resistance as a process of maintaining its identity. He explains that it is challenging to live in a white society trying to be accepted while at the same time struggling to practice Islam, in his experience he found out that it takes many years to build up. The article contains selective information on the challenges the Muslim students goes finished in Canadian schools and how they are able to negotiate and maintain their culture within the secular institutions.The generator of this article explains the eth no-religious subjugation facing the Muslim girls studying at gender segregated Islamic schools, how the teen girls reside at the nexus of dual oppression, confronting racism and Islamophobia in the society, also withstanding the patriarchal types of religious oppression in their communities. One example that supports this oppression is banning of hijab in public schools in France. The article contains the information on gendering Islamophobia, the politics of veiling, and veiling in public and Islamic schools, and their challenges.The article talks about postcolonial and international theories and post 9/11 disposition as frameworks for finding out the live experience of Muslim immigrants youths in US public schools, and how Muslims youths are viewed after the 9/11 round. The 9/11 attack has had a repercussion on the lives of Muslims students in US. The attack led to islamphobia hysteria and provoked the war on terror, this has led into the formation of Islamic

Macroeconomic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 4

Macro economic - Essay ExampleClimate change whitethorn no longer be ignored and new policy points to blow tax to deter carbon emissions. Immigration is another pressing vent where major reform may soon be in the works. The Democratic from Latinos signify a possible policy change in their favour. Finally, Mideast tension is a complicated problem where the author said that Obamas biggest second-term job is avoiding World War III (49).A fiscal policy that promotes revenue generation through taxes paves the way for presidency to have an increased budget for government expenditure and avoid budget deficit. Federal expenditures account for (1) pension and income security, (2) national defense, (3) health and (4) interest on the public debt (McConnell and Brue 85). The taxes that may be accumulated from carbon tax will address the prevalent environmental issues and these funds will most likely be used to promote environmental measures in avoidance of natural disasters. Allowing a lenie nt immigration policy is perceived to reduce employment opportunities to resident citizens. However, this issue is more often a matter of social justice and existing illegal immigrants settle for failing working conditions. An increase in population concurrently leads to a parallel increase in national expenditures. The same assessment is true for engaging in war which accounts for large budget deficits and public debt since it reallocates economic resources for war goods such as military spending for their personnel and armaments (ibid