Critical discussion of paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Critical discussion of paper - see Examplermly available legitimate professional identity in massage therapy, efforts to de familiarize the profession completely serve to promote heteronormativity, discrimination and sexual harassment. In this context, desexualization is in reference to efforts aimed at removing gender and sexual qualities and characteristics of men and women at work. However, it must also be noted that at the workplace, gender takes on duple forms with multiple meanings and consequences. For example, markers such as gender, education and training levels, sexuality, class and race leave behind subscribe several(predicate) implications of sexuality and affect workers and work differently. Sullivan (2014, p. 360) has given her position on desexualization and its consequences in massage therapy. This paper will critically discuss her arguments and give the writers own view on the issue of sexuality at the workplace. This will be done with the consideration that a lthough many organizations have attempted to monitor and confine their workers sexual behavior, workers have also been known to show resistance to the control and tried negotiating the constraints.It cannot be denied that so long as men and women work together, sexual feelings and relations at the workplace will eer exist (Erickson 2007, p. 79). However, this is not to mean that when they enjoy sexualized interactions, the possibility of damaging outcomes is eliminated. More specifically, massage therapists need to have legitimate professional identities since female and male therapists manage their marginalized identities differently. However, the efforts to desexualize the workplace and afford massage therapists a legitimate identity maintain heteronormativity, discrimination and sexual harassment (Sullivan 2014, p. 348). Sullivan (2014, p. 348) also correctly points out that organizational sexuality predominantly stem from organizational bureaucracy and feminist communications that support its eradication openly. This trust is true because the